Site icon HUMANITARIAN DISARMAMENT

Key Developments in Humanitarian Disarmament: Staying Strong amid Renewed Threats in 2026

Anna Kate Manchester, Armed Conflict and Civilian Protection Initiative

Almost two months into 2026, the humanitarian disarmament space is facing threats with the end of a significant nuclear arms control treaty, the adoption of dangerous policies on antipersonnel landmines and artificial intelligence (AI) in the military, and increased militarization across the globe. Such developments have pushed the Doomsday Clock closer to midnight than ever before. Undaunted, however, humanitarian disarmament actors have marked the new year by taking steps to reinforce and strengthen the international law that protects civilians from arms-inflicted harm. Supporters of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) celebrated the fifth anniversary of its entry into force on January 22, and that same day, Lebanon published its decision in its Official Gazette that it would accede to the Mine Ban Treaty. In addition, states parties to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) are developing a draft text that would be a good basis for negotiating a new treaty, and the Global IHL Initiative brought together states, international organizations, and civil society to strengthen international humanitarian law.

Campaigners from the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) celebrate the five-year anniversary of the entry into force of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. | Credit: ICAN, 2026.

In case you missed it…

Looking ahead, the CCW Group of Governmental Experts on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems will convene in Geneva for its first session of the year from March 2–6. Arms Trade Treaty working group meetings will take place in Geneva from March 16–19. From April 27–May 22, the 11th Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference will be held at the UN headquarters in New York.


This post expresses the views of the author and does not necessarily represent the views of the Armed Conflict and Civilian Protection Initiative (ACCPI), Harvard Law School’s International Human Rights Clinic, or Harvard University.

Exit mobile version